Portuguese | English





Pressione Enter para iniciar a Busca.





Volume 33, Nº 2, March and April 2020

   

DOI: 10.5935/2359-4802.20190085

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Internal Validation of a Risk Score for Prediction of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery

Rafael de March Ronsoni

Tiago Luiz Luz Leiria

Leonardo Martins Pires

Marcelo Lapa Kruse

Edemar Pereira

Rogerio Gomes da Silva

Gustavo Glotz de Lima





Abstract

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery has great clinical and economic implications. Many attempts have been made to identify risk factors aiming at a better evaluation of prophylactic treatment strategies.

Objective: To perform an internal validation of a risk score for POAF.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 1,054 patients who underwent myocardial revascularization and/or valve surgery was included. The risk score model was developed in 448 patients, and its performance was tested in the remaining 606 patients. Variables with a significance level of 5% in the cohort were included and subjected to a multiple logistic regression model with backward selection. Performance statistics was performed using the c-statistic, the chi-square and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit, Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: Four variables were considered predictors of outcome: age (≥ 70 years), mitral valve disease, the nonuse or discontinuation of beta-blockers and a positive water balance (> 1,500 mL). The ROC curve was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.79). The risk model showed a good ability according to the performance statistics – HL test x2 = 0.93; p = 0.983 and r = 0.99 (Pearson's coefficient). There was an increase in the frequency of POAF with the increase of the score: very low risk = 0.0%; low risk = 3.9%; intermediate risk = 10.9%; and high risk = 60.0%; p < 0.0001.

Conclusion: The predictive variables of POAF allowed us to construct a simplified risk score. This scoring system showed good accuracy and can be used in routine clinical practice. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; 33(2):158-166)

Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation; Myocardial Revascularization; Heart Valves/surgery; Perioperative Care; Risk Score; Prevention and Control.