Portuguese | English





Pressione Enter para iniciar a Busca.





Volume 110, Nº 2, February 2018

   

DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180020

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Correlation between Very Short and Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in Diabetic-Hypertensive and Healthy Subjects

Karina R. Casali

Beatriz D. Schaan

Nicola Montano

Daniela Massierer

Flávio M.F. Neto

Gabriela H. Teló

Priscila S. Ledur

Marilia Reinheimer

Graciele Sbruzzi

Miguel Gus



Figure 2 – Autonomic response to standing-up maneuver as evaluated by delta indices: delta HRV (heart rate variability), delta LF/HF (low frequency/high frequency) and delta of LF of blood pressure variability (LF_BPV), calculated from HR variability, LF/HF index and LF component of BPV, respectively. Box plots (median, 25 and 75% interquartile intervals) showing comparison between controls (C, blue bars) and diabetic-hypertensive (DH, green bars) groups. * p < 0.001 and ** p = 0.009 vs. C, Mann-Whitney rank sum test.





Abstract

Background: Blood pressure (BP) variability can be evaluated by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (24h-ABPM), but its concordance with results from finger BP measurement (FBPM) has not been established yet.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare parameters of short-term (24h-ABPM) with very short-term BP variability (FBPM) in healthy (C) and diabetic-hypertensive (DH) subjects.

Methods: Cross-sectional study with 51 DH subjects and 12 C subjects who underwent 24h-ABPM [extracting time-rate, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV)] and short-term beat-to-beat recording at rest and after standing-up maneuvers [FBPM, extracting BP and heart rate (HR) variability parameters in the frequency domain, autoregressive spectral analysis]. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to correlate BP and HR variability parameters obtained from both FBPM and 24h-ABPM (divided into daytime, nighttime, and total). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: There was a circadian variation of BP levels in C and DH groups; systolic BP and time-rate were higher in DH subjects in all periods evaluated. In C subjects, high positive correlations were shown between time-rate index (24h-ABPM) and LF component of short-term variability (FBPM, total, R = 0.591, p = 0.043); standard deviation (24h-ABPM) with LF component BPV (FBPM, total, R = 0.608, p = 0.036), coefficient of variation (24h-ABPM) with total BPV (FBPM, daytime, -0.585, p = 0.046) and alpha index (FBPM, daytime, -0.592, p = 0.043), time rate (24h-ABPM) and delta LF/HF (FBPM, total, R = 0.636, p = 0.026; daytime R = 0,857, p < 0.001). Records obtained from DH showed weak positive correlations.

Conclusions: Indices obtained from 24h-ABPM (total, daytime) reflect BP and HR variability evaluated by FBPM in healthy individuals. This does not apply for DH subjects. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(2):157-165)

Keywords: Hypertension; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Autonomic Nervous System; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory.