ABC | Volume 113, Nº4, Outubro 2019

Artigo de Revisão Magalhães et al. Princípios de PMTC Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(4):758-767 53. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, Vavere AL, Kitagawa K, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography andmyocardialperfusion imagingusing320-MDCT:theCTangiographyand perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentegenology.2011;197(4):829-37. 54. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2011;260(3):689-98. 55. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, et al. Adenosine Stress High-Pitch 128-Slice Dual-SourceMyocardial Computed Tomography Perfusion for Imaging of Reversible Myocardial Ischemia: ComparisonWith Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(5):540-9. 56. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Zeng Y, Jing H, Schoepf UJ, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamicmyocardial perfusion imagingwith second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenology. 2012;198(3):521-9. 57. Magalhães TA, Kishi S, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Vavere AL, Cox C et al. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015; 9(5):438-45. 58. Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F, Martus P, Stangl K, Greupner J, et al. Computedtomographyangiographyandmyocardialcomputedtomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):1476-85. 59. CerqueiraMD,WeissmanNJ, DilsizianV, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, LaskeyWK, et al. Standardizedmyocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105(4):539-42. 60. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):e44-122. 61. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(22):2233-41. 62. Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, GuglielmoM, Muscogiuri G et al. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct 12. pii: S1936- 878X(18)30751-4. Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da licença de atribuição pelo Creative Commons 767