ABC | Volume 110, Nº1, Janeiro 2018

Artigo Original Cerqueira Junior et al Escore GRACE em muito idosos Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(1):24-29 1. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, Arveiler D, Rajakangas AM, Pajak A. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents. Circulation. 1994;90(1):583-612. PMID: 8026046. 2. Roe MT, Messenger JC, Weintraub WS, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Dai D, et al. Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J AmColl Cardiol. 2010;56(4):254-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.008. 3. Pieper KS, Gore JM, FitzGerald G, Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Steg G, et al; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Investigators. Validity of a risk-prediction tool for hospital mortality: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Am Heart J. 2009;157(6):1097-105. doi: 10.1016/j. ahj.2009.04.004. 4. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, CannonCP, et al; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Investigators. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(19):2345-53. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345. 5. Goodman SG, Yan AT, Budaj A, Kennelly BB, Gore JM, Fox KA, et al; ExpandedGlobal Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE2) Investigators. The Expanded Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events: Baseline characteristics, Management Practices, and Hospital Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. AmHeart J. 2009;158(2):193-201. e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.003. 6. Correia LC, Freitas R, Bittencourt AP, Souza AC, Almeida MC, Leal J, et al. Prognostic Value of GRACE Scores versus TIMI Score in acute coronary syndromes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010;94(5):613-9. doi: http://dx.doi . org/10.1590/S0066-782X2010005000036. 7. Apple FS, Quist HE, Doyle PJ, Otto AP, Murakami MM. Plasma 99th percentile reference limits for cardiac troponin and creatine kinase MB mass for use with european society of cardiology/american college of cardiology consensus recommendations. Clin Chem. 2003;49(8):1331-6. PMID: 12881449. 8. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. 9. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, Grosswald R, Weintraub WS, O’Neill WW, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):723-30. PMID: 10987591. 10. Pena FM, Peixoto RS, Soares JS, Júnior HR, Pena GS, Netto MV, et al. Perfil clínico e angiográfico de pacientes idosos com síndrome coronariana aguda admitidos em hospital terciário. Rev SOCERJ. 2009;22(3):176-80. ID: [i]-538301. 11. Martin AC, Dumas F, Spaulding C, Silberman SM. Management and decision-making process leading to coronary angiography and revascularization in octogenarians with coronary artery disease: insights from a large single-center registry. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(5):544- 52. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12308. 12. Faustino A, Mota P, Silva J; researchers from the National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes, Portuguese Cardiology Society. Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in octogenarians: applicability of theGRACE and CRUSADE scores. Rev Port Cardiol. 2014;33(10):617-27. doi: 10.1016/j. repc.2014.01.025. 13. Gómez-Talavera S, Núñez-Gil I, Vivas D, Ruiz-Mateos B, Viana-Tejedor A, Martín-García A, et al. [Acute coronary syndrome in nonagenarians: clinical evolution and validation of the main risk scores]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2014;49(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2013.05.002. 14. Luo J, Yang M, Han L, Jia X, Chen L, Zhao Y. Validity of the GRACE score for 6-month death or reinfarction after presentation with acute myocardial infarction in patients 80 years of age and older. Coron Artery Dis. 2013;24(7):537-41. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000023. 15. Luo JG, YangM, Han L, Chen LW, Chen X, Gao K, et al. Validity of the Global RegistryofAcuteCoronaryEventsriskscore inpredictionofacutemyocardial infarction mortality in hospitalised Chinese patients aged 80 and over. Australas J Ageing. 2014;33(4):E1-5. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12044. 16. Costa PM, Vieira JL. Impacto da idade no tratamento da sindrome coronariana aguda em dois hospitais de Porto Alegre [Tese]. Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; 2007. 17. Buber J, Goldenberg I, Kimron I, Guetta V. One-year outcome following coronary angiography in elderly patients with non-ST elevationmyocardial infarction: real-world data from the Acute Coronary Syndromes Israeli Survey (ACSIS). Coron Artery Dis. 2013;24(2):102-9. doi: 10.1097/ MCA.0b013e32835c8f53. 18. Mattos LA, Zago A, Chaves A, Pinto I, Tanajura L, Staico R, et al. Acute myocardial infarction inprogressivelyelderlypatients.acomparativeanalysis of immediate results in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001;76(1):53-62. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2001000100006. 19. YanRT,YanAT,TanM,ChowCM,FitchettDH,ErvinFL,etal;CanadianAcute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) Registry Investigators. Age-related differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes. AmHeart J. 2006;151(2):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.039. Referências Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da licença de atribuição pelo Creative Commons 29