IJCS | Volume 33, Nº3, May / June 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36660/ijcs.20190013 206 EDITORIAL International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences. 2020; 33(3):206-207 Mailing Address: Ana Flavia Torbey Faculdade de Medicina - Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro - Rua Marques do Paraná, 303. Postal Code: 24220-900, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil E-mail: anaflaviamalheiros@gmail.com, aureagrippa@id.uff.br Challenge in the Treatment of Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Reducing Waiting Time for Cardiac Surgery Ana Flavia Malheiros Torbe y and Aurea Gripp a Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ – Brazil Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery; Public Health; Health Services Accessibility; Public Policy. Keywords Congenital heart disease is an important cause of mortality in the neonatal period. 1 in Brazil, according to data from DATASUS from the period between 2012 and 2016, congenital heart disease is the third most common malformation in children younger than 28 days, with an estimated incidence of 1.3-1.7% and high mortality rate in this age range. They are also the third main cause of global mortality in the first 30 days of life, the main cause among congenital abnormalities. Therefore, 28,000 new cases per year are expected in Brazil. 2,3 The outcomes of congenital heart disease can be grouped into spontaneous resolution of minor lesions, such as some interatrial or interventricular communications or persistent arterial duct; conditions that require repair procedures (interventional catheterizations or surgeries); and those cases that only palliative procedures can be performed due to anatomical and physiological features. Thus, approximately 20% of cases do not require surgery and resolve spontaneously, and nearly half of the other 80% (22,400 children) will require cardiac surgery in the first year of life. 4,5 In the last four decades, advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques, adaptation of neonates to cardiac catheterization, in addition to improvements in post- operative follow-up have changed the natural history of congenital heart disease, as most of the patients did not reach adult life in the past. 3,6 The early diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease, performed during prenatal care by fetal echocardiography, and neonatal screening by pulse oximetry have enabled the planning of appropriate treatment, increase in survival in the neonatal period and consequent improvement in the prognosis. 7 However, despite changes in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital heart disease, both prognosis and mortality may vary widely among the countries, due to poor access to healthcare services in developing countries, that show higher mortality rates compared with developed countries. 8 In Brazil, a continental-size country, there is also inequality between its geographic regions, with treatment gaps of nearly 90% in the northern and northeastern regions. 4,5,8 Today, there are 69 centers of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) where pediatric cardiac surgery can be performed, according to data published by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, 2017. However, in 49% of the specialized services, the minimum predicted pediatric surgeries for congenital heart disease is not reached, with an annual average of 17 surgeries per year, which is far lower than the expected 120 surgeries/year per pediatric center. 4 Therefore, one of the greatest challenges in the management of childrenwith heart diseases is to provide adequate access of these patients to appropriate treatment and follow-up, be it cardiac surgery or interventional catheterization. Jesus et al. report the size of this challenge in the article entitled Fila de Espera para Tratamento de Pacientes com Cardiopatia Congênita: Retrato de um Centro de Referência Amazônico . 9 In this report, the mean waiting time for elective hemodynamic procedures was 23.1 ± 18.3 months. Such longwaiting time has severe consequences, as it leads to a delay in adequate treatment, worse prognosis, increased number of hospitalizations, and high morbidity and mortality rates. The authors also highlight another issue to be addressed – the poor access of this population to primary health care, for diagnosis of the diseases and referral to treatment, surgical or not.