IJCS | Volume 33, Nº1, January / February 2019

32 1. Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, Diegeler A, Battellini R, Autschbach R, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1643-7. 2. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):529-34. 3. Soltesz EG, Cohn LH. Minimally invasive valve surgery. Cardiol Rev. 2007;15(3):109-15. 4. Castro Neto JV, Melo EC, Silva JF, Rebouças LL, Corrêa C, GermanoAQ, et al. Minimally invasive procedures – direct and video-assisted forms in the treatment of heart diseases. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102(3):219-25. 5. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, Bolman RM, Shekar PS, Chen FY, et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2008;33(4):537-41. 6. Sündermann SH, Sromicki J, RodriguezCetina BieferH, Seifert B, Holubec T, Falk V, et al. Mitral valve surgery: right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy?A systematic review andmeta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):1989-95.e4. 7. Raja SG, Navaratnarajah M. Impact of minimal access valve surgery on clinical outcomes: current best available evidence. J Card Surg. 2009;24(1):73–9. 8. Carr DB, Goudas LC. Acute pain. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2051-8. 9. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):534-40. 10. Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Easterwood R, Hong KN, Yang J, Cheema FH, et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(5):1471-7. 11. Wildgaard K, Ravn J, Kehlet H. Chronic post-thoracotomy pain: a critical review of pathogenic mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2009;36(1):170-80. 12. Cremer JT, Böning A, Anssar MB, Kim PY, Pethig K, Harringer W, et al. Different approaches for minimally invasive closure of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1648-52. 13. BlackMD, FreedomRM. Minimally invasive repair of atrial septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(3):765-7. 14. Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chu JJ, Liu HP, Tsai FC, Chung YY, et al. Surgical closure of atrial septal defect. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery or median sternotomy? Surg Endosc. 1998;12(6):820-4. 15. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18(4):1007-19. 16. Cosgrove DM3 rd , Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(6):1535-8. 17. Navia JL, Cosgrove DM 3 rd . Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(5):1542-4. 18. Langer NB, Argenziano M. Minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery: incisions and approaches. Methodist DebakeyCardiovasc J. 2016;12(1):4-9. 19. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, Le Bret E, Haugades B, Dassier P, et al. Open heart operation under videosurgery andminithoracotomy. References Silva et al. Minimally invasive surgery–pain investigation Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020;33(1):24-33 Original Article number of patients should be performed to confirm the differences in PI reported in our study and to overcome the limitations of this study. Conclusion Patients subjected to a MI cardiac procedure reported lower PI and fewer pain sites from the third PO day on, and showed lower need for pain medication and shorter ICU stay when compared to those subjected to a MS procedure. Based on these results, our study reinforces the advantages of a MI procedure for valve surgery. Author contributions Conception and design of the research: Silva JF, Castro JV, Montenegro RB, Lira R and Melo EC. Acquisition of data: Silva JF and Cavalcante, MP. Analysis and interpretation of the data: Silva JF, Castro JV and Melo EC. Writing of the manuscript: Silva JF, Cavalcante MP, Montenegro RB, Lira R, Melo EC, Castro JV.Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Silva JF, Cavalcante MP, Montenegro RB, Lira R, Melo EC, Castro JV. Potential Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. Sources of Funding There were no external funding sources for this study. Study Association This article is part of the thesis of master submitted by Juliana Fernandes Silva, from Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR). Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universidade de Fortaleza (Coética) under the protocol number 1104.606. All the procedures in this study were in accordance with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration, updated in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.