IJCS | Volume 31, Nº6, November / December 2018

621 Figure 1 - Flow diagram of the participants in every phase of the study, in accordance with the recommendations of the CONSORT Statement. INCLUSION Assessed for eligibility n = 40 Excluded n = 13 Did not meet the inclusion criteria n = 5 Gave up participation n = 8 Randomized n = 27 Conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation - Received intervention for allocation n = 13 ALLOCATION Virtual reality cardiovascular rehabilitation - Received intervention for allocation n = 14 FOLLOW-UP Conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation - Lost to follow-up: n = 1 - Reasons: Study withdrawal Virtual reality cardiovascular rehabilitation - Lost to follow-up: n = 2 - Reasons: Study withdrawal and hyperuricemia ANALYSIS Conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation - Analyzed: n = 12 - Excluded from the analysis: n = 1 (nonadherence to treatment) Virtual reality cardiovascular rehabilitation - Analyzed: n = 14 - Excluded from the analysis: n = 0 - Intention-to-treat analysis: n = 2 Silva et al. Virtual rehabilitation for individuals with heart disease Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2018;31(6)619-629 Original Article bioimpedance analysis with a tetrapolar bioimpedance device (Biodynamics ® , model 310e), analyzing and quantifying the body fat percentage, body fat weight, lean weight, basal metabolic rate, and percent and total water. Bioimpedance analysis measurements were taken in the morning, in fasting condition, after voiding the urinary bladder, having suspended diuretics for 24 hours, no alcohol and caffeine consumption for 24 hours, and no intense physical activity for 72 hours in both the initial and final assessment. 21,22