ABC | Volume 113, Nº5, Novembro 2019

Diretrizes Diretriz da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre Telemedicina na Cardiologia – 2019 Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(5):1006-1056 175. DeAsmundisC,RicciardiD,NamdarM,ChierchiaGB,SarkozyA,Brugada P. Role of homemonitoring in children with implantable cardioverter defibrillators for Brugada syndrome. Europace. 2013;15(Suppl 1):i17–25 176. Varma N, Michalski J, Epstein AE, Schweikert R. Automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces RoutineOfficeDevice Follow- up (TRUST) Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(5):428-36 177. SacherF,ProbstV,BessouetM,WrightM,MaluskiA,AbbeyS,etal.Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population. Europace. 2009;11(4):489-94 178. Slotwiner D, Varma N, Akar JG, Annas G, Beardsall M, Fogel RI, et al. HRS expert consensus statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):e69-100 179. Santini M, Ricci RP, Lunati M, Landolina M, Perego GB, Marzegalli M, et al. Remotemonitoring of patients with biventricular defibrillators through the CareLink system improves clinical management of arrhythmias and heart failure episodes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;24(1):53-61 180. VarmaN, Epstein A, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Shah J, Love CJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of automatic remotemonitoring for ICDFollow-Up: the TRUST trial. Circulation. 2010;122(4):325-32 181. Varma N, Johnson MA. Prevalence of cancelled shock therapy and relationship to shock delivery in recipients of implantable cardioverter- defibrillators assessed by remote monitoring. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S42-6 182. Grant B, Morgan GJ, McCrossan BA, Crealey GE, Sands AJ, Craig B, et al. Remote diagnosis of congenital heart disease: the impact of telemedicine. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(4):276-80 183. Webb CL, Waugh CL, Grigsby J, Busenbark D, Berdusis K, Sahn DJ, et al. American Society of Echocardiography Telemedicine Collaborators’ Group. Impact of telemedicine on hospital transport, length of stay, and medical outcomes in infants with suspected heart disease: a multicenter study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):1090-8 184. GrahamRN, Perriss RWand Scarsbrook AF. DICOMdemystified: a review of digital file formats and their use in radiological practice. Clin Radiol. 2005;60(11):1133-40 185. Pianykh O. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. 1st ed: Springer; 2008 186. Soares AH. Telerradiologia – Resolução Consleho Federal de Medicina, nº 2.107/2014. 2014 187. Blaha MJ, Cainzos-Achirica M, Greenland P, McEvoy JW, Blankstein R, Budoff MJ, et al. Role of Coronary Artery CalciumScore of Zero andOther Negative RiskMarkers for Cardiovascular Disease: TheMulti-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2016;133(9):849-58 188. McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Budoff M, Blaha MJ, Post WS, Kronmal RA, et al. 10-Year Coronary Heart Disease Risk PredictionUsing Coronary Artery Calcium and Traditional Risk Factors: Derivation in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) With Validation in theHNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) Study and theDHS (Dallas Heart Study). J AmColl Cardiol. 2015;66(15):1643-53. 189. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Cury R, Earls JP, Mancini GJ, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(5):342-58 190. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, FriedrichMG, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 May;15:35 191. Cavalcanti EFS. Uso do whatsApp em ambiente hospitalar - Parecer Conselho Federal de Medicina, nº14/2017. Internet. [Acesso em 04 abr 2018]. Disponível em: https://sbpt.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/ CFM-whatsapp.pdf 192. Sara L, Szarf G, Tachibana A, Shiozaki AA, Villa AV, Oliveira AC, et al. II Diretriz de Ressonância Magnética e Tomografia Computadorizada Cardiovascular da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia e do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(6 Suppl 3):1-86 193. Alexander AD. “Impacts of Telemation onModern Society” inOn Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1972, p.121-36 194. Rininsland H. ARTEMIS. A telemanipulator for cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16(Suppl 2):S106-11 195. Canale LS, Colafranceschi AS. Is robotic mitral valve surgery more expensive than its conventional counterpart? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(6):844-7 196. Sepehripour AH, Garas G, Athanasiou T, Casula R. Robotics in cardiac surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(Suppl 7):22-33 197. Lee JD, SrivastavaM, Bonatti J. History and current status of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circ J. 2012;76(9):2058-65 198. Poston RS, Tran R, Collins M, Reynolds M, Connerney I, Reicher B, et al. Comparison of economic and patient outcomes with minimally invasive vs.traditionaloff-pumpCABGtechniques.AnnSurg.2008;248(4):638-46 199. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, Oehlinger A, Ruetzler E, Friedrich G, et al. How to improve performance of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Surg. 2008;195(5):711-6 200. Desai HP, Tran R, Steinwagner T, Poston RS. Challenges of telerobotics in coronary bypass surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010;7(2):165-8 201. ReicherB,PostonRS,MehraMR,etal.Simultaneous‘hybrid’percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes. AmHeart J. 2008;155(4):661-7 202. Saceanu SM, Angelescu C, Valeriu S, Patrascu A. Telesurgery and Robotic Surgery: Ethical and Legal Aspect. J Community Med Health Educ. 2015;5(3):355 203. Ghezzi TL, Campos CorletaOC. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery.World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2550-7 204. Silva V, McGregor T, Rayman R, Luke PP. Telementoring and Telesurgery: Future or Fiction? Robot Surgery. Seung Hyuk Baik: IntechOpen. 2010.p.272. [Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/robot- surgery/telementoring-and-telesurgery-future-or-fiction-] 205. Nifong LW, Chu VF, Bailey BM, Maziarz DM, Sorrell VL, Holbert D, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(2):438-42 206. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, Smith CR, Argenziano M, Starnes VA, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(6):1395-404 207. Deeba S, Aggarwal R, Sains P, Martin S, Athanasiou T, Casula R, et al. Cardiac robotics: a review and St Mary’s experience. Int J Med Robot. 2006;2(1):16-20 208. Cavallaro P, Rhee AJ, Chiang Y, Itagaki S, Seigerman M, Chikwe J. In- hospital mortality and morbidity after robotic coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(1):27-31 209. Wright JD. Robotic-assisted surgery: Robotics in cardiac surgery balancing evidence and implementation. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1545-7 210. Sedrakyan A, Marinac-Dabic D, Holmes DR. The international registry infrastructure for cardiovascular device evaluation and surveillance. JAMA. 2013;310(3):257-9 211. Afshar AE and Parikh PB. Prevention of Contrast and Radiation Injury During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018;20(4):32 1053