ABC | Volume 113, Nº2, Agosto 2019

Minieditorial Rossi Neto Débito cardíaco contínuo não invasivo: mito ou realidade Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(2):240-241 métodos não invasivos para monitoramento do DC parecem ser mais um mito do que realidade nos dias atuais quando comparados aos métodos padrões para o cálculo do DC. É preciso continuar a busca para determinação do DC por métodos não invasivos no repouso e no exercício. Nossa esperança é que em um futuro próximo e com o progresso no desenvolvimento tecnológico, o monitoramento do DC não invasivo possa ser usado em ambientes controlados e não controlados, além do cenário perioperatório atual. 1. Coats AJ, Adamopoulos S, Radaelli A, McCance A, Meyer TE, Bernardi L, et al. Controlled trial of physical training in chronic heart failure. Exercise performance, hemodynamics, ventilation, and autonomic function. Circulation. 1992;85(6):2119–31. 2. Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):R197. 3. Vignati C, Cattadori G. Measuring CardiacOutput during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(Suppl1):S48–52. 4. BaladyGJ, Arena R, Sietsema K, Myers J, Coke L, Fletcher GF, et al. Clinician’s Guide to cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(2):191–225. 5. Stringer WW, Hansen JE, Wasserman K. Cardiac output estimated noninvasively from oxygen uptake during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82(3):908–12. 6. Williams SG, Cooke GA, Wright DJ, Parsons WJ, Riley RL, Marshall P, et al. Peak exercise cardiac power output; a direct indicator of cardiac function strongly predictive of prognosis in chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2001;22(16):1496–503. 7. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med. 1966;37(12):1208–12. 8. Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H583-589. 9. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22(2):113–9. 10. Rich JD, Archer SL, Rich S. Noninvasive cardiac output measurements in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(1):125–33. 11. Jones TW, Houghton D, Cassidy S, MacGowan GA, Trenell MI, Jakovljevic DG. Bioreactance is a reliable method for estimating cardiac output at rest and during exercise. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(3):386–91. 12. Joosten A, DesebbeO, Suehiro K, Murphy LS-L, Essiet M, Alexander B, et al. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in perioperative medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis†. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(3):298–310. 13. SandersM,ServaasS,SlagtC.Accuracyandprecisionofnon-invasivecardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review andmeta- analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Jun 7 [Epub ahead of print] 14. Okwose NC, Chowdhury S, Houghton D, Trenell MI, Eggett C, Bates M, et al. Comparison of cardiac output estimates by bioreactance and inert gas rebreathing methods during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018;38(3):483-90. 15. del Torto A, Skattebo Ø, Hallén J, Capelli C. Cardiac output with modified cardio-impedance against inert gas rebreathing during sub-maximal and maximal cycling exercise in healthy and fit subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(1):163–70. 16. Cool MT. Confiabilidade Teste-Reteste deMediçãoNão-Invasiva deDébito Cardíaco durante Exercício em Voluntários Saudáveis sob Condições Clínicas de Rotina. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(2):231-239. Referências Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da licença de atribuição pelo Creative Commons 241