ABC | Volume 113, Nº1, Julho 2019

Artigo de Revisão Pastore et al ECG/VCG na prática clínica atual Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(1):87-99 Figura 12 – Evolução, ao longo do tempo, dos aspectos eletrovetorcardiográficos após ablação por radiofrequência em paciente com ECG padrão tipo 1 da síndrome de Brugada. 1. Moffa PJ, Sanches PCR. Eletrocardiograma normal e patológico. 7ª. ed. São Paulo: Rocca; 2001. 2. Strauss DG, Olson CW, Wu KC Heiberg E, Persson E, Selvester RH, et al. Vectorcardiogram synthesized from the 12-lead electrocardiogram to image ischemia. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42(2):190-7. 3. Bayes de Luna A. Clinical electrocardiography: a textbook. 4th. ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. 4. Pastore CA, Samesima N, Munerato R. ABC do ECG. 3ª. ed. São Paulo: Medcel; 2013. 5. Gussak I, Antzelevich C, Wilde AAM, Powell BD, Ackerman MJ, Shen WK. Electrical diseases of the heart. London: Springer-Verlag; 2008. v.1. 6. Moss AJ. Can longQT syndrome be diagnosed by vectorcardiography when the corrected QT on the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram is of normal duration? Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(6):900-1. 7. Cortez D, Schlegel TT, Ackerman MJ, Bos JM. ECG-derived spatial QRS-T angle is strongly associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50(2):195-202. 8. Pastore CA, Samesima N, Tobias N, Pereira Filho HG. Eletrocardiografia atual: curso do serviço de eletrocardiografia do inCor. 3ª. ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2016. 9. Pastore CA, SamesimaN, Pereira FilhoHG, Madaloso BA. Controversial and similar aspects of the Brugada and J wave patterns: the vectorcardiogram point of view. J Electrocardiol. 2016;49(3):439-45. 10. Lingman M, Hartford M, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Rubulis A, Caidahl K, et al. Value of the QRS-T area angle in improving the prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:1-11. 11. Hurst JW. Methods used to interpret the 12-lead electrocardiogram: pattern memorizationversustheuseofvectorconcepts.ClinCardiol.2000;23(1):4-13. 12. Chou TC. When is the vectorcardiogram superior to the scalar electrocardiogram? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8(4):791-9. 13. Man S, Maan AC, Schalij MJ, Swenne CA. Vectorcardiographic diagnostic & prognostic informationderivedfromthe12-leadelectrocardiogram:historical review and clinical perspective. J Electrocardiol. 2015;48(4):463-75. 14. Sedaghat G, Ghafoori E, Waks JW, Kabir MM, Shvilkin A, Josephson ME, et al. Quantitative assessment of vectorcardiographic loop morphology. J Electrocardiol. 2016;49(2):154-63. 15. Carvalho Filho ET, Moffa PF, Pastore CA, Curiati JÁ et al. Vectorcardiographic study of normal aged subjects. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 1987;48(4):211-6. 16. SederholmM. The origin of monitoring of acute myocardial infarction with continuous vectorcardiography. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47(4):418-24. 17. Correa R, Arini PD, Correa LS, Valentinuzzi M, Laciar E. Identification of patients with myocardial infarction. Vectorcardiographic and electrocardiographic analysis. Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(3):242-9. 18. Warner RA, Battaglia J, Hill NE, Mookherjee S, SmulyanH. Importance of the terminal portion of theQRS in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55(8):896-9. 19. Pastore CA, Moffa PJ, Tobias NMO, Moraes AP, Nishioka SA, Chierighini JEC, et al. Bloqueios divisionais do ramo direito e áreas eletricamente inativas. Diagnóstico diferencial eletro-vetocardiográfico. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 1985;45(5):309-17. 20. Tobias NMMO, Pastore CA, Moffa PJ, Moraes AP, Lima EV, Del Nero Jr E, et al. Bloqueios divisionais do ramo direito na miocardiopatia chagásica. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 1986;47(6):387-91. Referências 98