ABC | Volume 111, Nº6, Dezembro 2018

Artigo Original Ghisi et al Validação do CADE-Q SV em português Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 111(6):841-849 1. Roth GA, Johson C, Abajobir A, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):1-25. 2. Gaziano TA, Pagidipati N. Scaling up chronic disease prevention interventions in lower- and middle-income countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:317-35. 3. Hamm LF, Sanderson BK, Ades PA, Berra K, Kaminsky LA, Roitman JL, et al. Core competencies for cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention professionals: 2010 update: position statement of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. J CardiopulmRehabil Prev. 2011;31(1):2-10. 4. Clark AM, HaykowskyM, Kryworuchko J, MacClure T, Scott J, DesMeulesM, et al. Ameta-analysis of randomized control trials of home-based secondary prevention programs for coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(3):261-70. 5. Davies E, Moxham TI, Rees K, Singh S, Coats AJ, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise training for systolic heart failure: Cochrane systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(7):706-15. 6. Anderson L, OldridgeN, ThompsonDR, Zwisler AD, Rees K, MartinN, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(1):1-12. 7. Wood DA, Kotseva K, Connolly S, Jennings C, Mead A, Jones J, et al; EUROACTION Study Group. Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family- based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9629):1999-2012. 8. Turk-Adawi K, Grace SL. Narrative review comparing the benefits of, participation cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24(5):510-20. 9. Aldcroft SA, Taylor NF, Blackstock FC, O’Halloran PD. Psychoeducational rehabilitation for health behavior change in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31(5):273-81. 10. Mullen PD, Mains DA, Velez R. Ameta-analysis of controlled trials of cardiac patient education. Patient Educ Couns.1992;19(2):143-62. 11. Ghisi GL, Abdallah F, Grace SL, Thomas S, Oh P. A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change? Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(2):160-74. 12. GraceSL,PoirierP,NorrisCM,OakesGH,SomanaderD,SuskinN;Canadian AssociationofCardiacRehabilitation.Pan-Canadiandevelopmentofcardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention quality indicators. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(8):945-8. 13. ThomasRJ,KingM,LuiK,OldridgeN,Pina IL,Spertus J,etal;AACVPR;ACC; AHA; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Sports Medicine; American Physical Therapy Association; Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation; Inter-AmericanHeart Foundation; National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists; Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Physical Therapy Association, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Inter-American Heart Foundation, National Association of ClinicalNurseSpecialists,PreventiveCardiovascularNursesAssociation,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J AmColl Cardiol. 2007;50(14):1400-33. 14. Grace SL, Turk-Adawi KI, Contractor A, Atrey A, Compbell NR, Derman W, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings: an International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Consensus Statement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59(3):303-22. 15. Dusseldorp E, van Elderen T, Maes S, Meulman J, Kraaij V. A meta-analysis of psycho-educational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol. 1999;18(5):506-19. 16. Brown JP, Clark AM, Dalal H, Weich K, Taylor RS. Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD008895. 17. Ghisi GL, Durieux A, Manfroi WC, Herdy AH, Carvalho T, Andrade A, et al. Construction and validation of the CADE-Q for patient education in cardiac rehabilitation programs. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010;94(6):813-22. 18. de Melo Ghisi GL, Oh P, Thomas S, Benetti M. Development and validation of an English version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(2):291-300. 19. Chaves GS, Ghisi GL, Grace SL, Oh P, Ribeiro AL, Britto RR. Effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation on functional capacity and cardiovascularriskfactors inBraziliansassistedbypublichealthcare:protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(6):592-600. 20. GhisiGL,GraceSL,ThomasS,EvansMF,OhP.Developmentandpsychometric validation of the second version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q II). Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(3):378-83. 21. Ghisi GL, Sandison N, Oh P. Development, pilot testing and psychometric validation of a short version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire: The CADE-Q SV. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(3):443-7. 22. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health- related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. 23. Hair JF, Anderson RE, TathamRL, BlackW. Multivariate data analysis. 5 th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998. 24. IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp. 25. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-49. 26. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas.1960;20(1):141-51. Referências Aprovação ética e consentimento informado Este estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais sob o número de protocolo 1.350.973. Todos os procedimentos envolvidos nesse estudo estão de acordo com a Declaração de Helsinki de 1975, atualizada em 2013. O consentimento informado foi obtido de todos os participantes incluídos no estudo. 848