ABC | Volume 111, Nº4, Outubro 2018

Artigo Original de Souza e Silva et al Intervenção coronariana percutânea no estado do Rio de Janeiro Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 111(4):553-561 Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da licença de atribuição pelo Creative Commons 8. Marso SP, Teirstein PS, Kereiakes DJ, Moses J, Lasala J, Grantham JA. Percutaneous coronary intervention use in the United States: defining measures of appropriateness. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(2):229-35. 9. de Souza e Silva CG, Klein CH, Godoy PH, de Souza e Silva NA. Trends and hospital mortality in myocardial revascularization procedures covered by the Brazilian Unified Health System in Rio de Janeiro State from 1999 to 2010. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2016;29(6):477-91. 10. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, Grantham JA, Maddox TM, Maron DJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With STABELA Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate UseCriteriaTaskForce,AmericanAssociation forThoracicSurgery,American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(17):2212-41. 11. Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, et al; ORBITA investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in sTABELA angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):31-40. Erratum in: Lancet. 2018;391(10115):30. 12. Silverman SL. From randomized controlled trials to observational studies. Am J Med. 2009;122(2):114-20. 13. Huynh T, Perron S, O’Loughlin J, Joseph L, Labrecque M, Tu JV, et al. Comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolytic therapy in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infaECAion: bayesian hierarchical meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Circulation. 2009;119(24):3101-9. 14. Marques RM, Piola S, Carrillo Roa A. Health system in Brazil: organization and financing. Rio de Janeiro: ABrES; Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, Departamento de Economia da Saúde, Investimentos e Desenvolvimento; OPAS/OMS no Brasil; 2016. 15. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Datasus. Informações de saúde – epidemiológicas e mortalidade [Citado em 2017 Jun 2]. Disponível em: http://www2.datasus.gov.br 16. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Sistema Nacional de Auditoria. Departamento Nacional de Auditoria do SUS [Citado em 2017 Jun 2]. Disponível em: http://sna.saude.gov.br . 17. World Health Organization. (WHO). The ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva; 1992. 18. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS). Perfil do setor – dados e indicadores do setor [Citado em 2017 Mai 25]. Disponível em: http://www.ans.gov.br 19. Bavishi C, Bangalore S, Patel D, Chatterjee S, Trivedi V, Tamis-Holland JE. Short and long-term mortality in women and men undergoing primary angioplasty: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;198:123-30. 20. Heer T, Hochadel M, Schmidt K, Mehilli J, Zahn R, Kuck KH, et al. Sex differences in percutaneous coronary intervention-insights from the coronary angiography and ICP registry of the German Society of Cardiology. J AmHeart Assoc. 2017;6(3).pii: e004972. 21. Danchin N, Ferrieres J, Guenoun M, Cattan S, Rushton-Smith SK, Greenlaw N, et al; CLARIFY Investigators. Management of outpatients in France with sTABELAcoronaryarterydisease.FindingsfromtheprospeCtiveobservational LongitudinAl RegIstry oF patients with sTABELA coronary arterY disease (CLARIFY) registry. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(8-9):452-61. 22. Kunadian V, Qiu W, Lagerqvist B, Johnston N, Sinclair H, Tan Y, et al; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research and Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registries. Gender differences in outcomes and predictors of all-causemortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (Data from United Kingdom and Sweden). Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(2):210-6. 23. Berger JS,SanbornTA,ShermanW,BrownDL. Influenceofsexon in-hospital outcomesand long-termsurvivalaftercontemporarypercutaneouscoronary intervention. AmHeart J. 2006;151(5):1026-31. 24. Jacobs AK, Kelsey SF, Brooks MM, Faxon DP, Chaitman BR, Bittner V, et al. Better outcome for women compared with men undergoing coronary revascularization: a report from the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI). Circulation. 1998;98(13):1279-85. 25. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatítica (IBGE). Tábua completa de mortalidade para o Brasil – 2015: Breve análise da evolução damortalidade no Brasil. [Citado em2017Mai 23]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br 26. Langørgen J, Igland J, Vollset SE, Averina M, Nordrehaug JE, Tell GS, et al. Short-term and long-term case fatality in 11 878 patients hospitalized with a first acute myocardial infaECAion, 1979-2001: the Western Norway cardiovascular registry. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(5):621-7. 27. Isaksson RM, Jansson JH, Lundblad D, Näslund U, Zingmark K, Eliasson M. Better long-term survival in young and middle-aged women than in men after a first myocardial infaECAion between 1985 and 2006. An analysis of 8630 patients in the northern Sweden MONICA study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Jan 5;11:1. 28. Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, Parikh M, Bergman G, Wong SC, et al; New York State Angioplasty Registry. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(10):1334-9. 29. HlatkyMA, BoothroydDB, Bravata DM, Boersma E, Booth J, Brooks MM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9670):1190-7. 30. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(8):496-501. 31. Macaya C, Serruys PW, Ruygrok P, Suryapranata H, Mast G, Klugmann S, et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: one- year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial. Benestent Study Group. J AmColl Cardiol. 1996;27(2):255-61. 32. Kiemeneij F, Serruys PW, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Albertsson P, et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(6):1598-603. 33. Nordmann AJ, Hengstler P, Leimenstoll BM, Harr T, Young J, Bucher HC. Clinical outcomes of stents versus balloon angioplasty in non-acute coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(1):69-80. 34. Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Nibbering E, van ‘t Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, et al. Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infaECAion. Heart. 2001;85(6):667-71. 35. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Arani DT, McCallister BD, Walford G, Ryan TJ. A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes for balloon angioplasty and coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(2):395-403. 36. Weaver WD, Reisman MA, Griffin JJ, Buller CE, Leimgruber PP, Henry T, et al. Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9222):2199-203. 37. BodenWE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, MaronDJ, KostukWJ, et al; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without ICP for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-16. 38. Sedlis SP, Hartigan PM, Teo KK, Maron DJ, Spertus JA, Mancini GB, et al. Effect of ICP on Long-TermSurvival in Patients with STABELA IschemicHeart Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(20):1937-46. 561

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM4Mjg=