ABC | Volume 110, Nº2, Fevereiro 2018

Artigo Original Rodrigues et al Práticas em Cintilografia de Perfusão Miocárdica Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(2):175-180 1. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M, et al; British Cardiac Society; British Nuclear Cardiology Society; British Nuclear Medicine Society; Royal College of Physicians of London; Royal College of Radiologists. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(2):261-91. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5. 2. Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, et al; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 ESC/ EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. 3. Cerci JJ, Trindade E, PretoD, Cerci RJ, Lemos PA, Cesar LA, et al. Investigation route of the coronary patient in the public health system in Curitiba, Sao Paulo and in Incor - IMPACT study. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(3):192-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20140107. 4. Pozzo L, Coura Filho G, Osso Jr JA, Squair PL. O SUS na medicina nuclear do Brasil : avaliação e comparação dos dados fornecidos pelo Datasus e CNEN. Radiol Bras. 2014;47(3):1418. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/0100 .3984.2013.1906. 5. Dos Santos MA, Santos MS, Tura BR, Félix R, Brito AS, De Lorenzo A. Budget impact of applying appropriateness criteria for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the perspective of a developing country. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23(5):1160-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0505-4. 6. Oliveira A, Rezende MF, Corrêa R, Mousinho R, Azevedo JC, Miranda SM, et al. Applicability of the appropriate use criteria for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(5):375-81. doi: http://dx.doi . org/10.5935/abc.20140140. 7. Einstein AJ, Pascual TB, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, Vitola JV, Mahmarian JJ, et al; INCAPS Investigators Group. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA nuclear cardiology protocols cross-sectional study (INCAPS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(26):1689-96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv117. 8. International Atomic Energy Agency. (IAEA). Quality management audits in nuclear medicine practices. 2 nd ed. Viena (Austria); 2015. (IAEA Human Health Series, nº33). ISBN: 978-92-0-101715-4. 9. International Atomic Energy Agency. (IAEA). IAEA NUMBAD: taking the pulse of nuclear medicine worldwide. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(5):16N. PMID: 19403871. 10. AmorimBJ, Nesquita CT, Araujo EB, Kubo T, Nogueira S, RiveraM. Guideline for rest and stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2016;29(3):243-7. doi: 10.5935/2359-4802.20160035. 11. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL. Return of dual-isotope SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging? Not so fast…. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22(3):523-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0034-y. 12. FerreiraMJ, CunhaMJ, Albuquerque A, Moreira AP, Ramos D, Costa G, et al. Prognosis of normal stress-only gated-SPECTmyocardial perfusion imaging: a single center study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(7):1639-44. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0245-3. 13. Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging. similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(3):221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.022. 14. Gowd BM, Heller GV, Parker MW. Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21(6):1200-12. doi: 10.1007/ s12350-014-9944-y. 15. Oliveira AR, Azevedo JC, Oliveira A, Mesquita CT. Cintilografia de perfusão miocárdica de estresse-isolado: por que, como e em quem? Rev Bras Cardiol. 2014;27(6):430-3. 16. DePuey EG, Mahmarian JJ, Miller TD, Einstein AJ, Hansen CL, Holly TA, et al. Patient-centered imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(2):185-215. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9523-z. Erratum in: J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(3):633. 17. DePuey EG, Ata P,Wray R, FriedmanM. Very low-activity stress/high-activity rest, single-day myocardial perfusion SPECT with a conventional sodium iodide camera and wide beam reconstruction processing. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(5):931-44. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9596-8. 18. Brasil. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear. Requisitos de segurança e proteção radiológica para serviços de radiografia industrial. Resolução CNEN nº 145, de 20 de Março de 2013. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União, 2013 março 25. 19. van Dijk JD, Jager PL, Ottervanger JP, Slump CH, Knollema S, van Dalen JA. Patient-specific tracer activity in MPI SPECT: A hands-on approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23(1):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0286-1. 20. Duvall WL, Croft LB, Ginsberg ES, Einstein AJ, Guma KA, George T, et al. Reduced isotope dose and imaging time with a high-efficiency CZT SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18(5):847-57. doi: 10.1007/ s12350-011-9379-7. 21. Lima R, Peclat T, Soares T, Ferreira C, Souza AC, Camargo G. Comparison of the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using a CZT-SPECT camera with a conventional anger camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(1):245- 251. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0618-9. 22. Kashyap R, Dondi M, Paez D, Mariani G. Hybrid imaging worldwide - Challenges and opportunities for the developing world: a report of a technical meeting organized by IAEA. SeminNucl Med. 2013;43(3):208-23. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.02.001. 23. Stathaki M, Koukouraki S, Papadaki E, Tsaroucha A, Karkavitsas N. The benefits of prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in reducing both artifact defects and patient radiation exposure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;105(4):345–52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150122. 24. Gutstein A, Bental T, Solodky A, Mats I, Zafrir N. Prognosis of stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with prone imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Sep 26. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0617-x. 25. Gibbons RJ, Askew JW, Hodge D, Miller TD. Temporal trends in compliance with appropriateness criteria for stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies in an academic medical center. Am Heart J. 2010;159(3):484-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.004. Referências Aprovação Ética e consentimento informado Este estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal Fluminense sob o número de protocolo 36682714.5.0000.5243. Todos os procedimentos envolvidos nesse estudo estão de acordo com a Declaração de Helsinki de 1975, atualizada em 2013. O consentimento informado foi obtido de todos os participantes incluídos no estudo. Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da licença de atribuição pelo Creative Commons 180