ABC | Volume 110, Nº2, Fevereiro 2018

Artigo Original Ferreira et al Método alternativo para o cálculo da EOA proj simplificada Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(2):132-139 5. Quiñones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA; Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: A report from the Doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(2):167-84. PMID: 11836492. 6. Bland JM, AltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-10. PMID: 2868172. 7. ClavelMA,FuchsC,BurwashIG,MundiglerG,DumesnilJG,BaumgartnerH, et al. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of themulticenter TOPAS Study. Circulation. 2008;118(14 Suppl):S234-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.757427. 8. ClavelMA,BurwashIG,MundiglerG,DumesnilJG,BaumgartnerH,Bergler-Klein J, et al. Validation of conventional and simplifiedmethods to calculate projected valveareaatnormalflowrateinpatientswithlowflow,lowgradientaorticstenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.2010;23(4):380-6.doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.002. 9. GiavarinaD. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. BiochemMed (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015 10. Bunce C. Correlation, agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.032. Este é um artigo de acesso aberto distribuído sob os termos da licença de atribuição pelo Creative Commons 139