ABC | Volume 114, Nº1, January 2019

Short Editorial Infective Endocarditis: Still a Deadly Disease Cristiane da Cruz Lamas 1, 2 Coordenação de Ensino e Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, 1 Rio de janeiro, RJ – Brazil Centro Hospitalar, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fiocruz, 2 Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil Universidade do Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO), 3 Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil Short Editorial related to the article: Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Mailing Address: Cristiane da Cruz Lamas • Rua das Laranjeiras, 374, Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil E-mail: cristianelamas@gmail.com Keywords Heart Failure/physiopathology; Endocarditis/complications; Endocarditis/surgery; Hospital Mortality; Comorbidity; Septic shock; Echocardiography/methods. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20190809 The important issue of in-hospital mortality in infective endocarditis (IE) is discussed by Marques et al. 1 In‑hospital mortality in the International Collaboration in Endocarditis (ICE) cohort (2000-2005) was 18%, 2 similar to the 17% in the large European cohort recently published, 3 both unacceptably high, considering that most patients included were from developed countries and voluntary registries. In the present article, in-hospital mortality was 42/134 (31.3%), higher than expected. The identified risk factors for in-hospital mortality were Staphylococcus aureus etiology, negative blood-cultures, evidence of valve obstruction in echocardiography, heart failure secondary to IE and septic shock. Cardiac surgery was protective for mortality. To me, the most important message is “surgery was protective for mortality”. This has been shown in several studies. 1-6 Surgical treatment is required in approximately half of the patients with IE because of severe complications, of which heart failure (acute or acute on chronic) is the most frequent, occurring in 40-60%. 7 It represents the most common indication for surgery in left- sided native valve IE. Surgery may need to be performed on an emergency (within 24 h) or urgent (within a few days, 7 days) basis, irrespective of the duration of antibiotic treatment, or maybe delayed 1 or 2 weeks of antibiotic treatment. 7 Although it is not clear which is the best timing, 6,8 surely before the onset of acute heart failure seems a good time. 9 A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated papers where early versus late surgical intervention or medical management for IE were done. 5 The definition used for early valve surgery in this publication was performance of surgery at 20 days or less of diagnosis of IE or during initial hospitalization. All-cause mortality was mentioned in 21 studies, and in the group that had early surgery, it was significantly lower than in the group without early surgical intervention (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.74, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was high among the included studies. However, regarding in-hospital mortality, a total of 11 studies reported on it and there was no significant difference between the early surgery and conventional therapy groups. 5 Wang et al. 8 addressed the issue of timing of surgery in patients with definite, left-sided IE according to the modified Duke criteria who underwent cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization. 8 This was a prospective cohort from the ICE -PLUS study and involved 485 patients who were operated during the same admission. Notably, cases of device-related IE were excluded from the analysis, as were hemorrhagic stroke before surgery, nosocomial IE, and surgery performance more than 60 days from admission. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to calculate a propensity score (probability) for early surgical treatment. The median time to surgery was 7 days ([IQR] 2-15). Patients who underwent earlier surgery had a lower percentage of preexisting heart failure (before IE diagnosis) but a higher rate of acute heart failure; no difference in 6-month survival across the quartiles (Quartile 1, surgery day 0 or 1; Q2, day 2 to 6; Q3 day 7 to 15; Q4 more than 15 days) of surgical timing was found. The risk of 6-month mortality was highest for patients who underwent surgery within the initial 2 days after admission or transfer. The authors concluded that the routine use of very early surgery for any indication is not supported by current data. 8 The EURO-ENDO study involved a prospective cohort of 3116 adult patients (2470 from Europe), years 2016 to 2018 with a diagnosis of probable or definite IE. 3 Cardiac surgery was indicated in 2160 (69.3%) patients but finally performed in only 1596 (73.9%) of them. In-hospital death occurred in 532 (17.1%) patients and was more frequent in prosthetic valve IE. 9 Independent predictors of mortality were Charlson index, creatinine > 2 mg/dL, congestive heart failure, vegetation length > 10 mm, cerebral complications, abscess, and failure to undertake surgery when indicated. Indications for surgery were hemodynamic in 46.3% of cases, embolic in 32.1%, and infectious in 64.2% (the latter a very percentage, which is different from other large series of IE). Surgery was performed emergently in 6.7%, urgently in 24.8%, beyond the 1st week in 32% and electively in 36.5%. Having an indication for surgery and not performing surgery was the group with the highest mortality in the study and figured as the take home message. Importantly, the main reason for not performing surgery was death before surgery (53%) of patients. 3 It seems clear that referring early for surgical evaluation by a team experienced in treating endocarditis and performing surgery in a timely manner is important. The timeframe between surgical indication and operation was 2 weeks in the article by Marques et al., 1 only a third of the patients were operated on, and 2/3 of patients did not have surgery indicated due to significant comorbidities. 1 In a prospective observational study on IE from multiple sites, surgical treatment for IE was performed in 733 patients, which represented 57% of all patients and 76% of patients with a surgical indication. 6 The median age was 57 years for patients 9

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM4Mjg=