ABC | Volume 113, Nº6, December 2019

Original Article Ket et al. Myocardial ischemia by SPECT and CCTA Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(6):1092-1101 1. Oliveira GB, AvezumA, Roever L. Cardiovascular disease burden: evolving knowledge of risk factors in myocardial infarction and stroke through population-based research and perspectives in global prevention. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Aug 12;2:32. 2. Moran AE, RothGA, Narula J, MensahGA. 1990-2010 global cardiovascular disease atlas. Glob Heart. 2014;9(1):3-16. 3. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, DeweyM, Arbab-Zadeh A, NiinumaH, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(22):2324-36. 4. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, RunzaG, vanMieghemC, MeijboomWB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(3):575-82. 5. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005;112(15):2318-23. 6. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass, Desbiolles L, Grünenfelder J, Marincek B, A et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(15):1482-7. 7. Gottlieb I, Bittencourt MS, Rochitte CE, Cavalcante JL. Coronary computed tomography angiography takes the center stage and here is why. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019;112(1):104-6. 8. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(3):552-7. 9. Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, Rochitte CE, Niinuma H, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(4):816-28. 10. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Küttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(3):343-8. 11. Coyne EP, Belvedere DA, Vande Streek PR Weiland FL, Evans RB, Spaccavento LJ.. Thallium-201 scintigraphy after intravenous infusion of adenosine compared with exercise thallium testing in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(6):1289-94. 12. Cury RC, Magalhães TA, Borges AC, Shiozaki AA, Lemos PA, Júnior JS, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(3):310-5. 13. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Butler J, Nomura CH, Ferencik M, et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology. 2008;248(2):466-75. 14. CuryRC,NiemanK,ShapiroMD,NasirK,CuryRC,BradyTJ.Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, andmyocardial perfusion – is it possible? J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(2):229-43. 15. Gupta NC, Esterbrooks DJ, Hilleman DE, Mohiuddin SM. Comparison of adenosine and exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. The GE SPECT Multicenter Adenosine StudyGroup. J AmColl Cardiol. 1992;19(2):248-57. 16. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incrementalprognosticvalueofmyocardialperfusionsinglephotonemission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death andmyocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97(6):535-43. 17. Nishimura S, Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Verani MS. Equivalence between adenosineandexercisethallium-201myocardialtomography:amulticenter, prospective, crossover trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(2):265-75. 18. Parodi O, Marcassa C, Casucci R, Sambuceti G, Verna E, Galli M, et al. Accuracy and safety of technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxy-2-isobutyl isonitrile (Sestamibi) myocardial scintigraphy with high dose dipyridamole test in patients with effort angina pectoris: amulticenter study. ItalianGroup of Nuclear Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(6):1439-44. 19. Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Curillova Z, Kwong RJ, Goldhaber SZ, Rybicki FJ, et al. Relationship betweenCT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(6):799-809. 20. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. Hybrid PET/CT is greater than the sum of its parts. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15(1):118-22. 21. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang HJ, Bluemke DA, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(3):174-82. 22. George RT, Silva C, CordeiroMA, DiPaula A, Thompson DR, McCarthyWF, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(1):153-60. 23. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, Lim P, Poncelet A, Pasquet A, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2006;113(6):823-33. 24. HachamovitchR,HayesSW,FriedmanJD,CohenI,BermanDS..Comparison oftheshort-termsurvivalbenefitassociatedwithrevascularizationcompared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900-7. 25. Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C, Ferencik M, Gulick S, Titus J, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology. 2004; 231(3):697-701. 26. Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Katoh M, Wildberger JE, Günther RW, Buecker A. Dynamic multi-section CT imaging in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary animal experience. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(3):746-52. 27. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Abbara S, Hoffmann U, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology. 2008;247(1):49-56. 28. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, Gebregziabher M, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(11):2414-24. 29. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Lai S, Cohen I, Lewin HC, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1999;100(10):1035-42. 30. Strauss HW, Pitt B. Noninvasive detection of subcritical coronary arterial narrowings with a coronary vasodilator and myocardial perfusion imaging. Am J Cardiol. 1977;39(3):403-6. 31. VanzettoG,OrmezzanoO,FagretD,CometM,DenisB,Machecourt J.Long- termadditiveprognosticvalueofthallium-201myocardialperfusion imaging over clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients : study in 1137 patients with 6-year follow-up. Circulation. 1999;100(14):1521-7. 32. Tanami Y, Miller JM, Vavere AL, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, et al. Nuclear stress perfusion imaging versus computed tomography coronary angiography for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by conventional angiography: insights from the CorE-64 multicenter study. Heart Int. 2014;9(1):1-6. 33. Hamirani YS, Isma’eel H, Larijani V, Drury P, Lim W, Bevinal M, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography comparedwithstressnuclear imaging inpatientsundergoing invasivecardiac catheterization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(5):645-51. References 1099