ABC | Volume 113, Nº5, November 2019

Guidelines Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on Telemedicine in Cardiology – 2019 Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(5):1006-1056 212. Plourde G, Pancholy SB, Nolan J, Jolly S, Rao SV, Amhed I, et al. Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015;386(10009):2192-203 213. Smilowitz NR, Balter S, Weisz G. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiology. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013;14(4):223-8 214. Bezerra HG, Mehanna E, G WV, A Costa M, Weisz G. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Interv Cardiol. 2015;28(5):449-55 215. Lo N, Gutierrez JA, Swaminathan RV. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous CoronaryIntervention.CurrTreatOptionsCardiovascMed.2018;20(2):14 216. MangelsDR,Giri J,Hirshfeld J,WilenskyRL.Robotic-assistedpercutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90(6):948-55 217. Smitson CC, Ang L, Pourdjabbar A, Reeves R, Patel M, Mahmud E. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30(4):152-6 218. Swaminathan RV, Rao SV. Robotic-assisted transradial diagnostic coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(1):54-7 219. Maor E, EleidMF, Gulati R, Lerman A, SandhuGS. Current and FutureUse of Robotic Devices to Perform Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Review. J AmHeart Assoc. 2017;6(7). pii: e006239 220. Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, Harrison J, Behnamfar O, Pourdjabbar A, et al. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted PercutaneousCoronaryIntervention inComplexCoronaryLesions:Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(13):1320-7 221. Mahmud E, Schmid F, Kalmar P, Deutschmann H, Hafner F, Rief P, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Results of the RAPID Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2058-64 222. Smilowitz NR, Moses JW, Sosa FA, Lerman B, Qureshi Y, Dalton KE, et al. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26(7):318-21 223. Weisz G, Smilowitz NR, Metzger DC, Caputo R, Delgado J, Marshall JJ, et al. The association between experience and proficiency with robotic- enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study. Acute Card Care. 2014;16(2):37-40 224. Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Delgado JA, Marshall JJ, Vetrovec GW, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1596-600 225. Madder RD, VanOosterhout S, Mulder A, ElmoreM, Campbell J, Borgman A, et al. Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(3):190-6 226. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Announces the Alliance for Nursing Informatics Selection of 2016-2017 Emerging Leaders: Nurses and Mentors Linked Through Informatics Professional Development Program. Comput InformNurs. 2016;34(5):196 227. Advisory Board. A milestone: Kaiser now interacts more with patients virtually than in-person. Daily Briefing, October 13, 2016. Internet. [Accessed in 2019 May 10]. Available from: https://www.advisory.com/ daily-briefing/2016/10/13/kaiser-telehealth 228. ConselhoFederaldeMedicina. (CFM).CódigodeÉticaMédica,Resolução CFMNº 2217, de 27 de setembro de 2018, modificado pelas resoluções n.2.222/2018 e 2.226/2019. [Internet]. [Acesso em 06 junho 2019]. Disponível em :portal.cfm.org.br 229. H.R.2 - 114th Congress (2015-2016). Public LawN.114-10-(04/16/2015) an Act. MedicareAccessand CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015. Internet. [Accessed in 2018 May 12]. Available from :https://www.congress . gov/114/plaws/publ10 /PLAW-114publ10.pdf. 230. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde.Secretaria de Atençao à Saúde. SUS. Relatório deGestão. Internet. [Acessoem05 fev2018].Disponívelem:https://www. relat--rio-de-Gest-oda-SAS-2015-Final.pdf 231. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Guia de avaliação, implantação e monitoramento de programas e serviços em telemedicina e telessaúde. 2018. Internet. [Acesso em25maio 2018]. Disponível em: http://rebrats. saude.gov.br/images/MenuPrincipal/Guia_Avaliacao_telessaude_ telemedicina.pdf 232. Figueira RM, Cunha LR, Neves DS, Alkmim MBM. From a Research Project to a Regular Telehealth Service: redefining objectives and strategies. Med-e-Tel 2013 The International Educational and Networking Forum for e-Health, Telemedicine and Health ICT, 2013 Luxembourg – Global Telemedicine and e-Health Updates: Knowledge Resources. 2013; 6: 264-7 233. Maldonado JM, Marques AB, Cruz A. Telemedicina: desafios à sua difusão no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32(Suppl 2):e00155615 234. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria nº 26, de 02 de agosto de 2017. Torna pública a decisão de incorporar a tecnologia de monitoramento remoto para avaliação de pacientes portadores de dispositivos cardíacos eletr nicos Implantáveis (DCEI) no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS. Brasília; 2019. Internet. [Acesso em 16 junho 2019]. Disponível em: www.downloads/portarias_SCTIE_26-27-29-30_consulta_ publica_33-34-35-36%20(2).pdf 235. Dinesen B, Nonnecke B, LindemanD, Toft E, KidholmK, Jethwani K, et al. Personalized Telehealth in the future: A Global Research Agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(3):e53 236. Brasil. Constituição 1988. Constituição da República Federativa de Brasil. Brasília: Gráfica do Senado; 1988 237. Dallari SG, Nunes Jr VS. Direito sanitário. São Paulo: Verbatim; 2010. p 68. 238. Resende NF. A amplitude da expressão saúde no marco normativo brasileiro. In: Bliancheriene AC, Santos JS (orgs). Direitoà vida e à saúde: impactos orçamentários e judicial. São Paulo. Atlas; 2010 239. PorterME.Whatisvalueinhealthcare?NEnglJMed.2010;363(26):2477-81 240. Schwamm LH. Telehealth: seven strategies to successfully implement disruptive technology and transform health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(2):200-6 241. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001 242. Pan E, Cusack C, Hook J, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Bates DW, et al. The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(5):446-53 243. KangHG, MahoneyDF, HoenigH, Hirth VA, Bonato P, Hajjar I, et al. In situ monitoring of health in older adults: technologies and issues. J AmGeriatr Soc. 2010;58(8):1579-86 244. Barnett TE, Chumbler NR, Vogel WB, Beyth RJ, Qin H, Kobb R. The effectiveness of a care coordination home telehealth program for veterans with diabetes mellitus: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(8):467-74 245. Jia H, Chuang HC, Wu SS, Wang X, Chumbler NR. Long-term effect of home telehealth services on preventable hospitalization use. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(5):557-66 246. ChanWV, Pearson TA, Bennett GC, CushmanWC, Gaziano TA, Gorman PN, et al. ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Implementation Strategies: A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135(9):e122-37 247. Cloutier A, Finley J. Telepediatric cardiology practice in Canada. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(1):33-7 248. Dowie R, Mistry H, Young TA, Weatherburn GC, Gardiner HM, Rigby M, et al. Telemedicine in pediatric and perinatal cardiology: economic 1052