ABC | Volume 112, Nº1, January 2019

Original Article Quintella et al FFR-versus angiography-guided PCI in multivessel disease Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 112(1):40-47 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License em Saúde. Relatório de Recomendação da Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS – CONITEC – 111. Stent farmacológico para o tratamento da DAC. [on-line]. 2014. [acesso em 2016 jul. 25]. Disponível em: <http://u.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2014/marco/17/ StentFarmacologicoCP-111.pdf> 15. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study: fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2816-21 16. Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, SundaramV, Perez MV, Varghese R, et al. Systematic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:703-16. 17. Li J, Elrashidi MY, Flammer AJ, Lennon RJ, Bell MR, Holmes DR,et al. Longterm outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography- guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(18):1375-83. 18. De Backer O, Biasco L, Lønborg J, Pedersen F, Holmvang L, Kelbaek H, et al. Long-termoutcome of FFR-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease in daily clinical practice: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis EuroIntervention. 2016;11(11):e1257-66. 19. Van Belle E, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, Teiger E, et al; Investigators of the Registre Français de la FFR–R3F. Outcome impact of coronaryrevascularizationstrategyreclassificationwithfractionalflowreserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry. Circulation. 2014;129(2):173-85. 20. Zhang D, Lv S, Song X, Yuan F, Xu F, Zhang M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a metaanalysis. Heart. 2015;101(6):455-62. 21. Moreira PBB. Custo-efetividade de programas de reabilitação cardiovascular. JornaldoDepartamentodeErgometriaeReabilitaçãoCardíaca.2004;27:14-6. 22. Fearon WF, Bornschein B, Tonino PA, Gothe RM, Bruyne BD, Pijls NH, et al; Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) Study Investigators. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserveguided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2010;122(24):2545-50. 23. Teich V, Araújo DV. Estimativa de custo da síndrome coronariana aguda no Brasil. Rev Bras Cardiol. 2011;24(2):85-94. 47