ABC | Volume 111, Nº6, December 2018

Original Article Ghisi et al Validation of the Brazilian-Portuguese CADE-Q SV Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 111(6):841-849 1. Roth GA, Johson C, Abajobir A, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):1-25. 2. Gaziano TA, Pagidipati N. Scaling up chronic disease prevention interventions in lower- and middle-income countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:317-35. 3. Hamm LF, Sanderson BK, Ades PA, Berra K, Kaminsky LA, Roitman JL, et al. Core competencies for cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention professionals: 2010 update: position statement of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. J CardiopulmRehabil Prev. 2011;31(1):2-10. 4. Clark AM, HaykowskyM, Kryworuchko J, MacClure T, Scott J, DesMeulesM, et al. Ameta-analysis of randomized control trials of home-based secondary prevention programs for coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(3):261-70. 5. Davies E, Moxham TI, Rees K, Singh S, Coats AJ, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise training for systolic heart failure: Cochrane systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(7):706-15. 6. Anderson L, OldridgeN, ThompsonDR, Zwisler AD, Rees K, MartinN, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(1):1-12. 7. Wood DA, Kotseva K, Connolly S, Jennings C, Mead A, Jones J, et al; EUROACTION Study Group. Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family- based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9629):1999-2012. 8. Turk-Adawi K, Grace SL. Narrative review comparing the benefits of, participation cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24(5):510-20. 9. Aldcroft SA, Taylor NF, Blackstock FC, O’Halloran PD. Psychoeducational rehabilitationforhealthbehaviorchangeincoronaryarterydisease:asystematic reviewof controlled trials. J CardiopulmRehabil Prev. 2011;31(5):273-81. 10. Mullen PD, Mains DA, Velez R. Ameta-analysis of controlled trials of cardiac patient education. Patient Educ Couns.1992;19(2):143-62. 11. Ghisi GL, Abdallah F, Grace SL, Thomas S, Oh P. A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change? Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(2):160-74. 12. GraceSL,PoirierP,NorrisCM,OakesGH,SomanaderD,SuskinN;Canadian AssociationofCardiacRehabilitation.Pan-Canadiandevelopmentofcardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention quality indicators. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(8):945-8. 13. ThomasRJ,KingM,LuiK,OldridgeN,Pina IL,Spertus J,etal;AACVPR;ACC; AHA; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Sports Medicine; American Physical Therapy Association; Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation; Inter-AmericanHeart Foundation; National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists; Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Physical Therapy Association, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Inter-American Heart Foundation, National Association of ClinicalNurseSpecialists,PreventiveCardiovascularNursesAssociation,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J AmColl Cardiol. 2007;50(14):1400-33. 14. Grace SL, Turk-Adawi KI, Contractor A, Atrey A, Compbell NR, Derman W, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings: an International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Consensus Statement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59(3):303-22. References preliminary evidence of its validity and reliability to assess cardiovascular patients’ knowledge in Brazil. It is hoped that this tool can support healthcare providers and CR programs to evaluate their patients’ knowledge in clinical practice and promote greater provision of educational strategies. The use of the Portuguese version of CADE-Q SV for clinical and research purposes will be free of charge, and all information – including the tool - is available online at https://cadeq.wordpress.com/. Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the undergraduate students Ully Caproni and Thiago Martins for the help with data collection in this study. Author contributions Conception and design of the research: Ghisi GLM, Chaves GSS, Britto R; Acquisition of data: Loures JB, BonfimGM; Analysis and interpretation of the data: Ghisi GLM, Chaves GSS, Loures JB, BonfimGM, Britto R; Statistical analysis andWriting of the manuscript: Ghisi GLM, Chaves GSS; Obtaining financing: Britto R; Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Ghisi G, Chaves GSS, Loures JB, Bonfim GM. Potential Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. Sources of Funding This study was funded by FAPEMIG and CNPq. Study Association This study is not associatedwith any thesis or dissertationwork. Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais under the protocol number 1.350.973. All the procedures in this study were in accordance with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration, updated in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. 847