ABC | Volume 111, Nº3, September 2018

Viewpoint Santos et al For a model of self-citation governance in ABC Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 111(3):423-426 1. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Memorial dos Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia: história da revista. [Citado em 2017 mar 10]. Disponível em: http://www.arquivosonline.com.br/memorial/historia.asp. 2. Evora PRB, Moreira LFP. The representativeness of the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia for Brazilian Cardiology Science. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;104(2):94-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150015. 3. Ronda-PupoGA. Research evaluation of author’s citation-based performance throughtherelativeauthorsuperiorityindex.Transinformação.2017;29(2):191- 201. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892017000200006. 4. 5 revistas brasileiras são acusadas de trapacear em citações. [Citado em 2013 jul 9]. Disponível em: http://exame.abril.com.br/ciencia/5-revistas- brasileiras-sao-acusadas-de-inflar-citacoes/. 5. Araújo CG. Peer review: a constantly-evolving scientific process. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012;98(2):32-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0066- 782X2012000200017. 6. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Plataforma Sucupira. [Citado em 2017 mar 20].Disponívelem :https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/ index_consultas.jsf 7. Ruiz MA, Greco OT, Braile DM. Journal impact factor: this editorial, academic and scientific influence. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2009;24(3):273- 8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382009000400004. 8. Moreira LF. Role of the International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences in the IncreaseofBrazilianpublicationsinCardiologyandCardiovascularSciences.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;107(1):1. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160109. 9. Thomaz PG, Assad RS, Moreira LF. Using the impact factor and H index to assess researchers and publications. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;96(2):90-3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2011000200001. 10. Fuster V. Impact factor versus impact to readers: not necessarily at odds. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(16):1753-4. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2014.09.001. 11. Zitt M. The journal impact factor: Angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on JK Vanclay’s article 2011. Scientometrics. 2012;92(2):485-503. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0697-6. 12. Baum JA. Free-riding on power laws: questioning the validity of the impact factor as ameasure of research quality in organization studies. Organization. 2011;18(4):449-66. doi: 10.1177/1350508411403531. 13. Vanclay JK. Impact factor: outdated artefact or steppingstone to journal certification? Scientometrics. 2012;92 (2):211-38. doi: 10.1007/s11192- 011-0561-0. 14. Laufer M. Los valores intangibles de las publicaciones científicas. Interciencia. 2013;38(5):322. 15. Calver MC, LilithM, Dickman CR. A ‘perverse incentive’ frombibliometrics: Could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation? Scientometrics. 2013;95(1):243-55. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0908-1. 16. Buela-Casal G, Zych I. What do the scientists think about the impact factor? Scientometrics. 2012;92(1):281-92. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012- 0676-y. 17. Sangwal K. Some citation-related characteristics of scientific journals published in individual countries. Scientometrics. 2013;97(3):719-41. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1053-1. 18. Van Raan AF. Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators. Scientometrics. 2012;92(2):457-69. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0747-0. References This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License The present model enabled an integrated, dynamic assessment of self-citation rates. During the period from January 2000 to December 2016, there was a stationary pattern of self-citation of original articles published in ABC, which is in accordance with ethical practices in scientific research. Based on our results, we believe that this governance instrument can be of great utility for monitoring the pattern of self-citation practices and increasing transparency of the impact factor as a metric parameter of the quality of scientific journals. Author contributions Conception and design of the research: Santos MAA, Barreto-Filho JÁ; Acquisition of data: Santos MAA, Santos DMS; Analysis and interpretation of the data and Statistical analysis: Santos MAA; Writing of the manuscript: Santos MAA, Santos DMS, Prado BS, Barreto-Filho JÁ; Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Santos MAA, Santos DMS, Prado BS, Barreto-Filho JÁ. Potential Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. Sources of Funding There were no external funding sources for this study. Study Association This study is not associatedwith any thesis or dissertationwork. 426