ABC | Volume 111, Nº1, July 2018

Letter to the Editor Challenges For Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Imaging And Residual Flow Tarik Yildirim, Ibrahim Altun, Mustafa Ozcan Soylu Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Mugla Sitki Koçman Üniversity Tip Fakültesi Orhaniye Mah. Haluk, Mugla – Turkey Mailing Addresss: Tarik Yildirim • Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology - Turkey E-mail: kdrtarik@gmail.com , kdrtarik@hotmail.com Manuscript received December 04, 2017, revised manuscript March 14, 2018, accepted March 14, 2018 Keywords Atrial Appendage; Septal Occluder Devices; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional; Medical Records. 1. Guérios ÊE, Chamié F, Montenegro M, Saad EB, Brito FS Junior, Caramori PA, et al. First results of the Brazilian Registry of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(5):440-7. 2. ZhouQ, SongH, Zhang L, DengQ, Chen J, Hu B, et al. Roles of real-time three- dimensionaltransesophagealechocardiographyinperi-operationoftranscatheter leftatrialappendageclosure.Medicine(Baltimore).2017;96(4):e5637. 3. Lam SC, Bertog S, Sievert H. Incomplete left atrial appendage occlusion and thrombus formation after Watchman implantation treated with anticoagulation followed by further transcatheter closure with a second- generation Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (Amulet device). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85(2):321-7. References Reply Thank you for your interest in our paper and the pertinent comments. We agree that in comparison to 2D, 3D-TEE provides far more information, security and predictability to percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. In our Service, real-time 3D-TEE is the default tool used for guidance in these procedures. However, the Brazilian Registry of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure is a multicenter Registry, which data has been collected since 2010. At that time, and even today, not all centers involved in the Registry had 3D-TEE available in the cath lab, and in those cases, guidance to the procedure was based solely on 2D-TEE information. Device selection was restricted due to the limited device availability in the Brazilian market. Only the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP, St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN) was available for use in Brazil until mid-2015, when the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) came into national market. We still do not have the Amulet device (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN) in Brazil, and LAmbre (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) became available in our market only in January 2018. Regarding the 2 patients in whom thrombus formation was detected at follow-up, in both cases the LAA was completely closed. Thrombus formation was not related to residual LAA flow - hence there was no indication for further procedure – but developed over the surface of the device. Both patients were treated with reinstitution of oral anticoagulation for 3 months with thrombus resolution, and there were no other adverse clinical consequences. Ênio E. Guérios, on behalf of the authors of the Brazilian Registry of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180135 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License We have read with great interest the paper entitled ‘First results of the Brazilian Registry of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure’ by Guérios et al 1 . is a very important study. We have some suggestions about this trial. Firstly, two-dimensional transeosophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) can evaluate the morphology of left atrial appendage in multiple views. But real-time three-dimensional transeosophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) provides more detailed images of the left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy than 2D-TEE. 2 A competent physician can accurately evaluate the LAA depth and landing zone. Moreover LAA closure depends on an accurate determination of anatomical structure. Therefore the 3D-TEE may show advantantages in relation to 2D-TEE in transcathater LAA closure. Secondly, we wonder which indicators were used the device selection. For example, Lefort occluder devices are appropriate for single-lobe appendage, but LAmbre occluder can be used in LAA depth < 21 mm. 2 Lastly we would like to know about the two patients whose devices showed thrombus formation, as incomplete LAA closure may be associated with an increased risk of thrombus formation and then the second device may be inserted. 3 Did the authors do further investigation and intervention in these patients? 117