ABC | Volume 110, Nº3, March 2018

Original Article Kang et al Multi-layer strain analysis in lymphoma survivors Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(3):219-228 Difference of GCS (%) Intraobserver Average of GCS (%) 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3 +1.96 SD 1.4 –1.96 SD –2.7 Mean –0.7 –34 –32 –30 –28 –26 –24 –36 –38 –22 Difference of GCS (%) Interobserver Average of GCS (%) 3 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3 –4 +1.96 SD 3.4 –1.96 SD –3.0 Mean 0.2 –30 –25 –35 –40 –20 Difference of CS-ENDO (%) Interobserver Average of CS-ENDO (%) 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 –1.5 –1.0 –0.5 –2.0 –2.5 –3.0 +1.96 SD 1.20 –1.96 SD –2.45 Mean –0.63 –40 –35 –30 –25 –45 –50 Difference of CS-ENDO (%) Intraobserver Average of CS-ENDO (%) 5 4 2 3 1 0 –1 –2 –3 –4 +1.96 SD 4.0 –1.96 SD –3.1 Mean 0.4 –40 –35 –30 –45 –50 Difference of CS-MID (%) Intraobserver Average of CS-MID (%) 3 4 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3 –4 –5 –6 +1.96 SD 2.6 –1.96 SD –4.7 Mean –1.0 –30 –25 –20 –35 –40 Difference of CS-MID (%) Interobserver Average of CS-MID (%) 4 6 2 0 –2 –4 –6 +1.96 SD 5.3 –1.96 SD –5.0 Mean 0.2 –26 –24 –22 –20 –28 –30 –32 –34 Difference of CS-EPI (%) Interobserver Average of CS-EPI (%) 8 6 4 2 0 –2 –4 –6 +1.96 SD 5.9 –1.96 SD –5.0 Mean 0.4 –30 –25 –20 –15 –35 –40 –10 Difference of CS-EPI (%) Intraobserver Average of CS-EPI (%) 3 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3 –4 +1.96 SD 1.9 –1.96 SD –3.6 Mean –0.9 –30 –25 –20 –15 –35 –40 –10 Figure 2 – Bland-Altman analysis of inter-, intra-observation reproducibility. 225