ABC | Volume 110, Nº2, February 2018

Original Article Rodrigues et al Practices in Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 110(2):175-180 11. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL. Return of dual-isotope SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging? Not so fast…. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22(3):523-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0034-y. 12. FerreiraMJ, CunhaMJ, Albuquerque A, Moreira AP, Ramos D, Costa G, et al. Prognosis of normal stress-only gated-SPECTmyocardial perfusion imaging: a single center study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(7):1639-44. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0245-3. 13. Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging. similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(3):221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.022. 14. Gowd BM, Heller GV, Parker MW. Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21(6):1200-12. doi: 10.1007/ s12350-014-9944-y. 15. Oliveira AR, Azevedo JC, Oliveira A, Mesquita CT. Cintilografia de perfusão miocárdica de estresse-isolado: por que, como e em quem? Rev Bras Cardiol. 2014;27(6):430-3. 16. DePuey EG, Mahmarian JJ, Miller TD, Einstein AJ, Hansen CL, Holly TA, et al. Patient-centered imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(2):185-215. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9523-z. Erratum in: J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(3):633. 17. DePuey EG, Ata P,Wray R, FriedmanM. Very low-activity stress/high-activity rest, single-day myocardial perfusion SPECT with a conventional sodium iodide camera and wide beam reconstruction processing. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19(5):931-44. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9596-8. 18. Brasil. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear. Requisitos de segurança e proteção radiológica para serviços de radiografia industrial. Resolução CNEN nº 145, de 20 de Março de 2013. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União, 2013 março 25. 19. van Dijk JD, Jager PL, Ottervanger JP, Slump CH, Knollema S, van Dalen JA. Patient-specific tracer activity in MPI SPECT: A hands-on approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23(1):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0286-1. 20. Duvall WL, Croft LB, Ginsberg ES, Einstein AJ, Guma KA, George T, et al. Reduced isotope dose and imaging time with a high-efficiency CZT SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18(5):847-57. doi: 10.1007/ s12350-011-9379-7. 21. Lima R, Peclat T, Soares T, Ferreira C, Souza AC, Camargo G. Comparison of the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using a CZT-SPECT camera with a conventional anger camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(1):245- 251. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0618-9. 22. Kashyap R, Dondi M, Paez D, Mariani G. Hybrid imaging worldwide - Challenges and opportunities for the developing world: a report of a technical meeting organized by IAEA. SeminNucl Med. 2013;43(3):208-23. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.02.001. 23. Stathaki M, Koukouraki S, Papadaki E, Tsaroucha A, Karkavitsas N. The benefits of prone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in reducing both artifact defects and patient radiation exposure. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;105(4):345–52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150122. 24. Gutstein A, Bental T, Solodky A, Mats I, Zafrir N. Prognosis of stress- only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with prone imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Sep 26. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s12350- 016-0617-x. 25. Gibbons RJ, Askew JW, Hodge D, Miller TD. Temporal trends in compliance with appropriateness criteria for stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies in an academic medical center. Am Heart J. 2010;159(3):484-9. doi: http://dx.doi . org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.004. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 180